|
|
|
| |
| |
Paseo Colón 315,
5º “D”
C1063ACD – Buenos Aires-Argentina
Tel :( 54 11) 4331-3919
(54-11) 4-331- 493
(54-11) 4331- 5158
Fax (54-11) 4331- 5162
E-mail:
rr.americas@oie.int |
| |
http://www.rr-americas.oie.int Copyright © 2009 OIE
World organisation for animal health
Dir. de la publicación : Dr. Barcos
Webmaster: I.Borgeaud |
|
| Back |
Regional Commission> Strategic Plan |
OIE Regional
Commission for the Americas
Proposed Strategic Plan 2005 - 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Background:
A group of the OIE Regional Commission for the
Americas officials as well as the Regional Representative for the
Americas met in Mexico City in December 2003 and again in Fort Collins,
Colorado in January 2004 to develop the region’s strategic plan
. The original plan was written in 1998. This new plan is intended
to be reviewed at the March, 2004 meeting of the OIE Regional Commission
for the Americas. If agreement is reached by the Commission, this
plan will serve as a guideline for regional activities over the next
several years. It is important for the Commission to review this plan,
assess its progress, and make modifications on a periodic basis. |
|
Current
Situation
In developing future directions, the planning group agrees that:
• the Region has carried out a number of successful activities
over the past five years including the development of :
o guidelines and training in risk analysis,
o harmonized standards for pharmaceuticals and biologics (through
the Committee of Veterinary Medications for the Americas –
CAMEVET)
o a regional web site and forms of electronic communication
between member countries,
o training events, conferences and seminars dealing with significant
animal health issues.
• Member countries continue to experience vastly different
social, political, and economic conditions,
• such conditions directly impact Member countries’
ability to maintain their animal health infrastructure and to
conduct effective animal health programs and policies, and
• the Regional Commission for the Americas plays a unique
role in linking the OIE to individual member countries. The Regional
Commission will encourage member countries to:
o participate in the development and adoption of standards,
o contribute expertise to the OIE’s Specialist Commissions
and working groups,
o assist in obtaining support from development agencies for
member countries to maintain an effective animal health infrastructure,
and
o focus on animal health issues of particular importance to
member countries in this hemisphere.
1)The group included Dr. Peter Fernandez,
Dr. Angel Omar Flores, Dr. João Mauad Cavalléro, Dr.
Brian Evans and Dr. Claudio Ternicier. Dr. Michael David, Dr. Robert
Werge, Dr. Cristobal Zepeda, Dr. Mo Salman and Sra. Lupita Corominas
provided support.
|
 |
Long
Term Strategy The mission of the OIE Regional Commission
for the Americas has two main roles. The first is to assist Member
countries to fully and actively participate in the OIE and to derive
the benefits of such participation. The second is to assist in adapting
OIE goals, strategies, programs and activities to the unique conditions
and needs of the Americas. The role of the Office of the OIE Regional
Representation for the Americas is to provide coordination, activities
and continuity for these major tasks.
After reviewing regional activities to date, the planning group
agrees that:
• the OIE region remains committed to the three principal
strategic areas of its original strategic plan:
o a focus on strengthening the capacity of the national veterinary
services,
o a strengthening of national animal health information systems,
o the harmonization of animal health standards.
• activities in each of these areas should be more clearly
focused,
• several activities proposed in 1998 should be set aside,
• new themes proposed by the OIE, such as animal welfare
and food safety and production, should be addressed only as the
overall direction of the OIE on these topics becomes clearer.
|
 |
1.
Focus on Strengthening of the National Veterinary Services
The planning group recognizes the central role of national veterinary
services in ensuring animal health in the member countries. The planning
group is concerned with the current situation of these services. In
many member countries, funding and support for these services are
declining dramatically. An adequate animal health infrastructure is
essential if these countries are to provide for their own food security,
for maintaining public health, for providing economic and trade opportunities
for their producers, and for responding to animal disease emergencies.
The current outbreak of Avian Influenza in Asia demonstrates the critical
importance of an adequate animal health infrastructure. OIE activities,
at the global or regional level, can only be effective when such national
infrastructures are in place.
The planning group also recognizes that:
• the OIE is a standard-setting and information organization,
not a development agency per se,
• the OIE is in the process of strengthening relations with
international agencies such as the World Bank, the Food and Agricultural
Organization (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), Pan American
Health Organization (PAHO), etc.
• leaders in national governments and in the private agricultural
sector need to hear and adopt a clear message on the economic and
political value added by national veterinary services, and
• the Regional Commission for the Americas can assist in building
support with national governments and producer groups for their
National Veterinary Services and the economic and health benefits
that are derived from them.
The primary objective of this strategic area is “to assist
in the sustained development of flexible and strong national veterinary
services.” The goal will be measured by the number of successful
events of OIE Regional Commission assistance in the promotion of
projects dealing with animal health infrastructure and/or in the
provision of sustained public funding for the National Veterinary
Services.
Proposed actions
The OIE has recently published, both in the Code and in a
separate publication, models and methods of evaluation for national
veterinary services. Using this information as a base, the planning
group proposes to:
• Develop a policy paper on the value added by national veterinary
services to the private and public sectors. This paper would address
a private and public sector audience with the goal of providing:
o a common language for Member country representatives to discuss
their critical economic and health roles;
o suggested projects to enhance surveillance components as the core
for the national veterinary services; and
o a guide for discussion with development agencies on hemispheric,
regional, and country specific development animal health projects.
• Conduct a series of workshops to build support for the
ideas listed above and projects and sustained efforts at supporting
national veterinary services in member countries. These workshops
would:
o seek participation by private and public sectors as well as development
agencies,
o be conducted on a sub regional areas: South America, Caribbean,
Central America, etc.
• Request the Regional Representative with the assistance
of Member countries to develop a two year action plan. This plan
will seek to promote meetings and opportunities for dialogue with
development agencies and national leaders in the public and private
animal agricultural sectors. A key element in such talks is the
role of standards under the SPS agreements for expanded economic
and trade opportunities. Such meetings would aim at increasing producer
and public support for both strengthening activities and sustained
funding for the National Veterinary Services,
• Develop a summary report from these workshops and meetings
for the next OIE Regional meeting. This report would emphasize strategies
and tactics that have been successful at the national or regional
level for building support of national animal health services.
|
 |
2.
Build Capacity in Information Systems
Animal health information systems are an essential element in strong
national veterinary services. These systems are key components for
a robust agricultural economy by providing confidence in animal health
status and a foundation of animal health programs. The planning group
recognizes the valuable work done since 1998 by the Working Group
on Risk Analysis, a key component of animal health information systems.
This work has been coordinated through the OIE Collaborating Center
at USDA APHIS Veterinary Services’ Centers for Epidemiology
and Animal Health. A number of organizational tools were used to adapt
risk analysis techniques to the needs of the member countries. These
included:
• use of experts from a number of member countries,
• periodic meetings of the experts with a clear goal of developing
guidelines for the hemisphere as a publishable document,
• ongoing connections with other Working Groups within the
OIE,
• communications support, and
• numerous training events coordinated with other agricultural
and development agencies.
Animal health surveillance, traceability, and epidemiology are
as critical as risk analysis in providing the basic tools for ensuring
animal health in the member countries. The Collaborating Center
has held annual courses in animal health epidemiology (in Spanish)
for the past several years for the pertinent specialists from countries
of the Americas.
Proposed actions
The planning group recognizes the clear need for continuing
to build capacity with the countries of the Americas in their information
and reporting systems. As the 2003-2004 outbreak of highly pathogenic
Avian Influenza has shown, this need as weel as a need for a regional
response has become very important. Member countries’ confidence
both in each country’s information systems and in each country’s
ability and willingness to report their health status is crucial
for building viable national and regional markets.
To develop specific actions, the planning group has asked the Collaborating
Center to gather a small group of experts from Member countries
to determine the future direction and focus of training, guidelines
development and methodologies in support of animal health surveillance
and reporting systems for the Americas. The planning group notes
that the utilization of certain techniques, such as Geographical
Information Systems and Animal Identification, may only be appropriate
in a limited number of member countries. It could be, therefore,
that future directions may develop several lines of capacity building
oriented toward the different conditions under which member countries
operate. It is suggested that this group of experts meet and develop
such a plan within six months of the approval of this strategic
plan. |
 |
3.
Harmonize Standards
The planning group notes the importance of the work done to date with
veterinary pharmaceuticals and biologics with the formation of CAMEVET,
the committee which looks at standardizing requirements to facilitate
the international movement of such products within the Americas. The
committee now meets annually and has established relations and communications
with similar regional and international organizations. However,
the planning group recognizes the broader scope of harmonization
which includes developing, adopting and implementing harmonized
animal health standards, activities that are key to the work of
the OIE and to the National Veterinary Services of its Member countries.
The coordination of the use of standards throughout the Americas
is a critical and ongoing task for the Office of Regional Representation
and for the Regional Commission as a whole.
Proposed
actions
The planning group recommends:
• Continued support for the committee that reviews veterinary
pharmaceuticals and other biological agents,
o Review its operations to identify ways of improving its effectiveness,
• Increased participation by Member countries in the development
of standards and to the review of proposed changes to the Code.
This would involve:
o Personal and more frequent communication among the Member countries
on key proposals for changes to the standards
o Enhance web site capability to handle Member country comments
on proposed changes
• Increased use of experts from member countries on OIE Specialist
Commissions, Ad hoc and Working Groups dealing with standards (and
their underlying scientific justification), and
• Increased encouragement by the Regional Commission and Regional
Representation to Member countries to adopt and respond to changes
in the Code as they are adopted,
|
|
Institutional
Issues
In its meeting, the planning group discussed several issues related
to its institutional development. These included the need to:
• Provide basic orientation and information to new delegates
to the OIE from Member countries. This is essential given the relatively
high rate of turnover in delegates from the Americas. Such orientation
should be institutionalized within the Office of the Regional Representation
and should cover such elements as: OIE organization and structure,
voting and other processes, workings of the General Session, etc.
• Expand its membership to all of the countries of the Region.
This would lead to the inclusion of a number of countries in the
Caribbean who are not yet members of the OIE.
• Provide a better opportunity for briefing the delegates
from the Region on important issues on which they are asked to vote
at the annual May meeting in Paris,
• Provide for a more equitable funding base for the Office
of the Regional Representation and the activities proposed in this
strategic plan,
• Clarify the organic rules for proposing and establishing
regional working groups and commissions. In reference to the recent
establishment of the regional Permanent Commission on TSEs in Animals,
the planning group will:
o consult with the Director General and the Administrative Commission
on the regulations for the establishment of regional commissions,
o examine the role of working groups, commissions, and other relevant
organizational tools in dealing with significant animal health issues
within the region,
o develop a set of norms to be followed for the establishment of
such groups, and
o propose adoption of those norms at the March, 2004 regional meeting.
|
 |
Summary
The planning group notes the direction of the OIE in moving into the
areas of animal welfare and food safety. Individuals from Member countries
in the Region are participating in OIE Working Groups and Ad hoc groups
on these topics. The planning group notes, however, that, as the work
of the OIE progresses and standards in these key areas are developed,
the Regional Commission will work to include these in its strategic
plan.
Given this experience, therefore, this second strategic plan for the Region
proposes to focus on actions related most closely to the national
veterinary services, to animal health surveillance and reporting
systems, and to harmonization of standards. As the direction of
the OIE in new areas becomes clearer, the Region may find it has
a useful role in those areas. At this point, however, the Region
should build on the successes and experience of its first five years,
creating more specific measures for its actions and delivering clear
benefits of participation to its Member countries. |
|
Summary
Table
Strategic Areas and Lines of Action
The mission of the OIE Regional Commission of the Americas has two
main roles. The first is to to assist member countries in full and
active participation in the OIE and in deriving the benefits of such
participation. The second is to assist in adapting OIE goals, strategies,
programs and activities to the unique conditions and needs of the
Americas.
Objectives |
Measures |
Initial Activities |
Focus on National
Veterinary Services |
To assist
in the sustained
development of flexible and
strong National Veterinary Services
|
Successful
instances of OIE Regional
assistance in the creation of development
projects or in the provision of sustained
public funding for NVSs |
Develop major policy paper |
| Develop action plan
(May 2004) |
Conduct workshops and meetings in accord
with Action Plan (May 2004-March 2006) |
| Summary report on outcomes (March 2006) |
Build Capacity
in Information Systems |
To build
the capacity of Member Countries in the full complement
of skills needed for effective
animal health information systems
|
Individuals trained
and utilized in their
countries in techniques and components
of animal health information systems |
Adapt and utilize risk analysis
guidelines and personnel trained in this area |
Continue training in basic epidemiology
courses |
Develop plan for next phase of capacity
building (Oct 2004) |
Harmonize
Animal Health Standards |
To increase Member
Countries participation in the development
and implementation of animal
health standards
|
Increase Member
Country participation
Increase implementation of OIE standards |
Continue and review work of CAMEVET
|
Increase participation in developing,
reviewing, adopting and implementing of OIE standards |
|
 |
Addendum:
Requests to the OIE Central Bureau
The planning group made two requests to the OIE in Paris to assist
with its strategic plan.
These were to:
• Include leaders from national governments and from key
producer organizations in events, meetings and dialogues. The current
outline of the new OIE Strategic Plan (2005 – 2010) mentions
the horizontal strengthening of relations with international organizations
and the international financial community. Such strengthening is
essential. However the reality of many of the Member countries in
the Region is that the importance of national veterinary services
to leaders in their own national governments and in their own agricultural
economies is not clearly understood. It is essential that the OIE
Central Bureau assist the Region in outreach to these critical constituencies.
The prestige and recognition of the OIE has the ability to bring
together the international financial community and the leaders of
the Member countries’ agricultural sector and, increasingly,
producer groups. Whenever possible, the OIE should support the efforts
of the region to reinforce the critical role of the National Veterinary
Services.
• Select themes for the General Session Meetings and the
Regional Commission Meetings that reflect current topics of interest
or concern to the Member countries. The current pattern is to choose
a topic several years in advance, conduct a survey, and report on
the survey results. This pattern results in surveys that are poorly
answered and in topics that do not respond to Member countries’
interests and needs. An alternative approach would be to informally
poll the membership on “hot topics” approximately six
months prior to the meeting. An expert could then be assigned to
present the issue based on his/her expertise or to develop a paper
and presentation covering critical aspects of the topic. Such an
approach would not only stand a much better chance of being timely
and relevant but would also attract interest and dialogue among
the Member countries.
Additional Notes for
Planning Team Members
1. Elements for Policy Paper
During our discussion of the policy paper,
we listed a number of points that could be included in such a document.
The policy paper would consist of two parts. The first would be
a discussion of key benefits derived from a viable National Veterinary
Service. This would constitute “the message” to be communicated
to key political and producer leaders. The second would be an Action
Plan of events that would act as forums for translating that message
into increased support for projects and/or public expenditures for
National Veterinary Services.
Key points regarding “the message:”
National Veterinary Services:
Contributions to the public and private sectors
• Food security, including food safety
• Public health (e.g., Avian Influenza in Asia)
• Production costs (chance of lowering them through healthier
animals)
• Expanded economic opportunities
• Trade opportunities
• Social values
• Confidence in regulatory systems
• Need for infrastructure to respond to threats/risks (this
has an impact beyond the agricultural sector)
• National efforts need to be linked at the regional level
We need to site examples of positive accomplishments of NVSs.
In terms of actions or venues in which this message could be communicated
and discussed…venues that would lead to increased support:
• Taking advantage of ongoing activities (meeting of three
North American CVOs with Director General)
• Workshops (proposed within plan)
• Producer groups like ALA
• Collaboration with other regional groups
• National meetings
2. Alternative Matrix
We discussed alternatives to organizing the strategic plan
in terms of the current OIE matrix of goals and objectives. A proposed
framework is contained in the following matrix. The use of an alternative
approach could be the topic of a future conversation.
Transparency |
Standards |
International
Cooperation |
| |
|
|
• Notification
• Political wil
• Epidemiological surveillance
• Diagnostic building capacity
|
• Participation in development
• Implementation of national standards
• Identification of experts
• Scientific support by norms and recommendations
|
• GICSA
• BID, USAID, BM, etc (fundings)
• NGOs
• Facilitate cooperation among countries
|
| |
|
 |
|